Sr No Description Opportune HRMS SaaS Traditional License
HRMS Audience
1 Fits any type of organization small to big. 25 employees to 25000 employees
Yes
No
HRMS services Economics
1 Capital investment [Capex]
No
Yes
2 Opex cost

Yes

(as per use)

Yes

(Fix)

3 Payment link to deliverable
Yes
No
4 Expensive Back up & storage device requirement
No
Yes
5 Maintenance cost for server by the client
No
Yes
6 Annual Maintenance for the software updates
No
Yes
7 Pay only for what you use
Yes
No
HRMS Set Up
1 HRMS Go live with required payroll modules & functionality
12-15 days

30-45 days

(server set up will take more then 15 days)

Features & Value adds HRMS solution
1 Auto update of HRMS software
Yes
No
2 Flexibility for features
Yes
Yes
3 Business continuity 4 hours guarantee
Yes

Yes

(at a very high cost)

4 HRMS Vendor otivation model for quality service delivery
Yes
No
5 Scalability of the product with business dynamics of the Company & market [Future proof]
Yes

Yes

(Expensive & complex)

Whether you’re a founder thinking about using third party software for your start-up, or thinking about how best to structure licenses to your software, it’s important to consider how “Software as a Service” or “SaaS” licenses differ from traditional software licenses and understand the legal issues related to using them.This report will help you understand the salient features of both the models.

Traditional software Licenses

  • In this model the vendor permits the organisation to use a copy of their software on your servers and systems.
  • This means the the client or the organisation must have a large initial capital outlay to “purchase” the license.
  • The software has to be tested and certified to operate on various platforms.
  • Updates and maintenance require a planned, structured and multiple stakeholders to be involved.Massive backup and precautions are a must. Plus upgrade cost is on the client

On Cloud

Everyone is talking about cloud now daysIt enables browser-based delivery, developers realized that providing applications as a “hosted” software service (known as “Software as a Service” or “SaaS”) is a more efficient approach because :

  • Customer doesn’t need to do capital investment for purchase of license and server. They essentially    subscribe for the service.
  • The client only pays for the number of employees on the roll. So no wastage of unused capacity.
  • The developers can provide bug fixes and updates to all the licensees at once.
  • You can work on your regular platforms. No need to install new systems and platforms. Which mean    no extra installation costs? No learning curve.
  • Auto updates & upgrades
  • NO Annual Maintenance cost
  • Green Environment
  • Guarantee of quality of service, as it is linked to payments to the SaaS provider.
  • Why own an item, which has no appreciation value